June 23, 2009

  • So what is missing here and in the belief based system of evolution ?

    dinochrt

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Did I hear the word links ?

     

    What about scientific evidence for Macroevolution ?

     

    Maybe if we all wish upon a star some alien will bring us the proof we all  need that macroevolution is real . Science was replaced with the religion of time and chance! I’m still waiting for someone to allow me to observe Macroevolution and test it to see that it truly occurred or is about to occur and with out anyone cheating by adding information in an unnatural way since we want to see it brought about by natural selection .

     

     

Comments (5)

  • The tree is built upon homology when no tangible fossil links are found, and when it comes to extinct taxa (such as dinosaurs) where we can’t test DNA or observe behavior, the relationships are tenable at best, which any paleontologist will tell you.

    Now, what would you accept as “macroevolution”? You never did give a good explanation for what a “kind” was in my post on The Creationist Concept of Kind. Nor did you explain what genetic barrier there happens to be to keep microevolution from becoming macroevolution.

    Would the evidence I present here count towards evidence of macroevolution?

    So tell me, what do you want from scientists that would validate evolution to you?

  • And please, I invite any one of Barry’s readers to follow those links I provided to my recent posts and answer any of these questions. Or answer them here, I don’t care.

  • This actually doesn’t represent reality.  Better if there is a lot more empty space with very few actual types of fossils–with a whole lot of very few types of fossils found.  Think of a connect-the-dots without any picture.

  • I also invite you to my newest post, about statistical evidence for heredity in molecular biology and evidence for evolution. Not an easy read, but if you’re sincere about hoping to find the truth about evidence for “macroevolution,” I feel it is worth a read.

  • So do you write these posts and ignore all dissenting opinions on purpose, or did you just happen to miss my three rational responses?

Post a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *